If only everything in our newsroom?
The newsroom is supposed to revolutionize the publishing houses. The statements of Mr. Ringier to this topic on television (at Giacobbo / Müller) were in fact short and straightforward. In order to avoid the gaze of the Sunday view, the view in the evening and look online for all individually Corpses in a cellar search, is now controlled from the newsroom, says the publisher. That makes so sense to think of - but it was not in the past so that the editors have discussed internally? At least from the perspective of readers, there was hardly accidental overlaps.
Who is in some of the theme Newsroom soon notices, as it is about rather than overlap - it is about costs. For newsrooms, thanks to a website could now be used much easier for different vessels. So just to look, look in the evening, look online and Sunday look. But actually, you can play this idea even further. Why should not this also the same for content Schweizer Illustrierte, Cash Online, Bolero, happiness Post, Radio Energy andsoforth so on .... be used. One might imagine that an economy exists within the editorial newsroom and this then produces content for all media, from Ringier - meaning Aldente to webdo.ch. Plausible that fewer journalists to be needed. And also obvious that all this costs less.
is for the reader but now the question: Shall I keep buying more different publications from Ringier and see and hear broadcasts of Ringier and because you always get served up the same content? Or better wrestler should not just another newspaper, a magazine, a TV show and make a website? Even the would-effective.
And here's a link with the positive aspects of the newsrooms. And about here link to a more hopeful analysis of the news rooms.
