The author, Karin Doll brings home, in your scientific contribution to the key words "Internet" and "Political Learning together , addresses the question of inweit the Web as full of promise "medium power" (Neverla, 1998) the 90 since the circulating claims as an innovator and change drivers was just and where expectations have not been confirmed.
Dollhausen takes first meaningful things on the Web in its 1.0 and 2.0 features and supports this with arguments of scientists who published around the turn of the millennium. It concedes that have been in the "rezenptiven media work," the "active media work" and in the field of "Teaching and learning happens paradigm shift by the new medium, but - have been partially overvalued euphoric - so Dollhausen.
The medium of the Internet in the comments Pro-simplifying the arguments and the increase of speed in production, distribution and reception granted. Furthermore, is the author of that decentralization is not as important Eigfenschaft the Web in question and recognize the resulting opportunity for political participation as well. However, these are after Dollhausen arguments relating only to the technical characteristics of the Internet. [1]
would neglect here the dimension of the role of the Internet as a tool in the context of individual and social policy learning processes. [2]
In continuous text are various arguments put to the test. This concrete evidence of the early speculations are compared. Karin Dollhausen daruf indicates that the Internet policy as a hoped-for "media education of everyone" does not exist, because commercial providers and public educational institutions represented on the other hand, are displaced. [3] Similarly, the skills of teachers, the possibilities are exploit the Internet for the learning process is very low. This leads Dollhausen a researcher (King, 2001), which proves that the degree of use of the Internet in public education "is extremely small." Regarding the usage rate of the social-networking opportunities for political education purposes Dollhausen notes that this is in comparison to the total number of users rather marginal. [4]
conclusion draws Karin Dollhausen possible lines of development and goals of political Formation in connection with the use of the Web.
[1] See Dollhausen (2004a: 2)
[2] See Dollhausen (2004a: 3)
[3] See Dollhausen (2004a. 4f)
[4] Vgl. DOLLHAUSEN (2004a:5)
Quellen:
DOLLHAUSEN, Karin (2004a): Internet und Politikaneignung. Wie verändert die Netzkommunikation das politische Lernen? Vortragsmanuskript, gehalten im Rahmen der Edupolis – Konferenz: „ e-learning nach dem Hype – zwischen Ernüchterung und der Entdeckung neuer Möglichkeiten für (politisches) Lernen im WWW "From 10/13/2004 to 10/16/2004 in DGB Education Centre Hattingen.
Link: http://www.edupolis.de/praesenz2004/folien/dollhausen.pdf , access: 04.03.2009, 10:25 clock
weiterführend:
Dollhausen, Karin (2004b): The Internet - a medium of political appropriation? German Institute for Adult Education. Bonn. Online Library.
Link: http://www.die-bonn.de/esprid/dokumente/doc-2004/dollhausen04_01.pdf , Access: 04.03.11:55 Clock
0 comments:
Post a Comment