Sample Completion Community Service

shooter ass - Thoughts on the Conscription

"Protect ass in the last link" - this phrase has become an identity label for military duty has become. Young Men - Just outgrown the school - may find in the army, how little so-called freedom and equality are worth at least if you a man. Despite all the talk about the "new man" and the demonization "of traditional masculinity" here are all young men to the ground what they should not be loud modern gender theory.

The boys were fed them in the schools and kindergartens with gender education to her sensitive, considerate to make softer, more communicative, more peaceful, more social, in short, feminine beings. Of course, all these are not leased properties by women, it is done only as than is the case. In any case, there were in class group work on misogyny. There were role plays in which the boys wear dresses and the girls were allowed to behave like Macker. Also in role play, the boys were prepared to behave as if their future wives want to go to work and to lead them, the men, the children. There were also sex education to physically violent husbands or battered wives. While the girls in the Girls' Day, among others, could breathe in the army - they would later to the army may not have to - they are remaining in school and behaved like boys sat with their allegedly destructive and outdated images of masculinity apart or were allowed to ironing and cooking (which is really easy).

But now that school is over, the boys learn as a grown-ass shooter to know the world from below. Past the pink, cuddly soft-We-Are-Equal opportunities drivel. All of them will be beaten again in the following months out of my head, instead they are now prepared for the role that they are today demanded almost in spite of so-called equality.

balancing act with perineal tear

This is the draft, and especially the stubborn clinging to her a prime example für die verheuchelte und schizophrene Wesensart heutiger Gleichstellungsparolen. An keinem Beispiel wird so deutlich, dass alte Rollenmuster zwar dort abzustrafen sind, wo sie den Frauen schaden, dort aber zu kultivieren sind, wo sie den Frauen nutzen oder zumindest den Männern schaden. Für den Erhalt alter Rollenmuster kann man schließlich immer die Männer selbst verantwortlich machen. Wenn sie beim Spagat zwischen "Schütze Arsch" und "Papa Wundervoll" einen Dammriss erleiden, so haben sie sich entweder nicht genügend Mühe gegeben oder sie sind einfach nicht flexibel genug.

Ein vielsagendes Zeugnis dieser Doppelzüngigkeit war jüngst die Rede des Bundespräsidenten Christian Wulff bei einem Besuch in der Marineschule Mürwik bei Flensburg. Dort lobte er die Bundeswehr ob ihrer Verdienste bei der Überwindung überkommener, gesellschaftlicher Rollenbilder. Dabei stellte er die "Selbstverständlichkeit" heraus, mit der Frauen heute Dienst an der Waffe leisten. Darüber, dass allein Männer zu diesem Dienst gezwungen werden, verlor er kein Wort. Und von der Überwindung überkommener Rollenbilder kann angesichts einer Dienstpflicht nur für Männer keine Rede sein. Gott sei Dank muss man Christian Wullf nicht allzu ernst nehmen. Wulff ist der personifizierte Mainstream, fleischgewordenes Mittelmaß und der leibhaftige Beweis dafür, dass - ganz wie es die Verfassung will - wirklich jeder Präsident werden kann.

Männer sind kein Rohstoff

Was man aber ernst nehmen muss, ist die Selbstverständlichkeit, mit der Männer seit jeher wie Gebrauchsgegenstände und Verschleißmaterial behandelt werden. So kam bei der Debatte um die Abschaffung der Wehrpflicht einigen Politikern nichts besseres in den Sinn, als sogleich über eine allgemeine, von der Wehrpflicht losgelöste Dienstpflicht für Männer nachzudenken. Diese soll Männer dazu verpflichten, Zwangsdienste nicht nur in sozialen Einrichtungen, sondern auch bei der Polizei, Katastrophendiensten, kulturellen Einrichtungen, oder in Bereichen wie Ökologie, Denkmalpflege, Politics and sports to serve. A passionate representative of this requirement is Dorothee Baer, \u200b\u200bmanager of the Unit for gender equality for boys and men "of the CDU / CSU.

It's embarrassing enough that, in the form of this paper, the interests of men and boys are just represented by a woman. However it is the fact that this woman is only with the question of how one young men more effectively utilize and can cannibalize. Such things are symptomatic of an exclusively by and for women made gender equality. Wherever men policy, feminist care operated, the whole thing has always somewhat disreputable gouvernantenhaftes itself. Under the heading of "promotion for women - education for the men," is what men and boys usually only policy to the alleged negative excesses of masculinity and their correction. The focus is on how men can change to meet the women nor fair, and what men can do anything to their unspeakable debt to the women to make amends. Guilt is known to be one of the most feminine tools when it comes to exploit men and have them work in the sense of women.

education? Restitution?

When it comes to justifying the unilateral military or official duty, we find all these patterns again. There is the educational element, after the men allegedly offset against women have social deficits, for which own the excellent community service. Men are not social creatures half that we have to force her to happiness. It needs no further explanation that this is just a hollow Prejudice, one of many emanations of a pervasive Misandrie, the female simply all good qualities and bad qualities of all male names. In short, stupid!

Dorothee Baer

reparations and debt relief are a recurrent argument. Men should provide compulsory service to compensate the women for the birth and upbringing of children. Unfortunately, however, there are a surprising number of women undergoing the traditional roles do themselves. This is particularly true for women who have finished no higher education, but like most people carry a simple job without career prospects (do, incidentally, the vast majority of men). If such a woman faced with the question of whether they take care of the kids or sit 8 hours a day at the supermarket is, it often comes down to the children, because for them it means a greater life fulfillment. It also raises the question of what could be done with those women who receive no children, with a steadily falling birth rate is a relevant question. A general Gebärpflicht will not come into question.

addition to his military service compensated for the continued existence of discrimination against women. As well-founded, the military service can probably even the next thousand years maintained. Finally, in some hidden Winkel immer noch ein kleines bisschen Benachteiligung finden. Notfalls kann diese auch biologischer und gottgegebener Art sein. Im schlimmsten Falle lassen sich Benachteiligungen auch herbeifantasieren.

Männern geht es im Schnitt schlechter

Nun ist aber nicht nur die Spitze der Gesellschaft männlich, der Bodensatz ist es ebenso. 63 Prozent aller Sonderschüler und zwei Drittel aller Schulabbrecher sind männlich, wie auch die meisten Arbeitslosen. 90 Prozent aller Obdachlosen und 70 Prozent aller Gewaltopfer sind Männer. Dabei ist der männliche Bodensatz wesentlich breiter als die Spitze. Dem Frauenmangel in Führungsetagen steht eine Armee von Männern compared with that fail once the jump in the normal labor market. Compared to male problems at the bottom of the female problems are at the top is a luxury phenomenon. The demand for compensation is therefore a naked impudence.

Conscription is antiemanzipatorisch

such is the demand for a universal compulsory military service for men revealing. But it shows what the world really can hidden in the minds of alleged gender politicians I . Adopted men continue to make service in the army, police, civil defense, or in social institutions, während Frauen davon befreit sind, weil diese ja Kinder gebären und erziehen. Auf diese Weise stünde fest, wie die Rollen in unserer Gesellschaft verteilt sind: die Männer übernehmen Verantwortung für das Große, für Staat und Gesellschaft. Frauen hingegen sind für das Kleine, die Familie, zuständig. Was um alles in der Welt hat das mit modernem Rollenverständnis und Gleichberechtigung zu tun? Tatsächlich offenbart sich hier eine stockreaktionäre Geisteshaltung. Wer eine allgemeine Dienstpflicht für Männer fordert oder auch nur an der bestehenden Wehrpflicht festhält, gibt sich antiemanzipatorisch. Hier mit Gleichberechtigung zu argumentieren, wirkt geradezu zynisch.

Männer sind auch Menschen

Männer sind auch Menschen! Was das in Hinblick auf die allgemeine Dienstpflicht bedeutet, erklärt uns die Genfer Konvention für Menschenrechte. Sie verbietet jede Form von Zwangsarbeit oder Leibeigenschaft. Ausnahme ist die Wehrpflicht inklusive eines entsprechenden Ersatzdienstes. Dabei gilt es zu verstehen, dass der eigentliche Sinn des Zivildienstes darin besteht, Männer, die den Dienst an der Waffe verweigern, in anderen Gebieten auszubilden, um sie im Kriegsfalle anderweitig zu verwenden, etwa als Sanitäter. Dies bedeutet zweierlei: erstens ist der Zivildienst ebenso wie der Wehrdienst ein Kriegsdienst; zweitens handelt es sich dabei not a labor service but rather a form of training. From the latter follows that community service should not be used as mere workers otherwise would be to speak of forced labor.

Since the civil service is often the principle of "learning by doing" applies is to distinguish between education and mere work so easily. If, however, make social organizations and politicians no secret of the fact that the system would be more expensive without the constraint of service and with it lost an important support would then indirectly to proof that community service in the past, just yet exploited as cheap labor. We therefore draw the conclusion that failed in the past in the practical implementation of civilian service to human rights, was not that anyone would have disturbed it.

A compulsory service, which would be decoupled from the military service would run, but already formally against the Geneva Convention because it would not be of a more community service, but an independent labor service. But even it took long time no offense until a few weeks ago the question arose, not whether women should be forced to provide such a service. Suddenly the family minister also announced Schroeder to speak, that the Ministry for the community service is responsible. She put it unmistakably clear that a social obligation year "a huge encroachment on the freedom of a young man and that therefore could be expected with long odds. By other bodies of those reasons could be heard, oddly enough, but should meet only at the time because it gave the women. Conscription, however, was obviously never a "huge encroachment on the freedom of a young man."